You are currently browsing the Dowlen Law Blog weblog archives for the day September 8, 2008.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | Oct » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
- Adoption (2)
- Business Law (10)
- Child Advocacy (5)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Criminal Law (15)
- EDAD 6050/7050 (1)
- Freedom of Religion (6)
- Freedom of Speech (6)
- General Law (15)
- Gun Law (2)
- Immigration (1)
- Injury Law (34)
- Insurance Law (28)
- Insurance Practices (19)
- Juvenile (2)
- Litigation (22)
- Negotiations (5)
- Right To Life (6)
- You've got to be kidding! (3)
- January 11, 2012: If the State cheats, they should lose.
- January 11, 2012: The hiring and firing of "ministers" - Hosanna-Tabor v/ EEOC
- December 1, 2011: Tennessee Gun Laws
- August 24, 2011: Dealing with insurance companies.
- February 9, 2011: Tennessee sticks close to the insurance policy wording.
- January 16, 2011: Church Planting
- December 29, 2010: Child Custody and a "Material Change"
- October 31, 2010: Thankful
- May 2, 2010: Issues with sex?
- April 23, 2010: Is the National Day of Prayer Constitutional?
Blogs
Other Web Sites
- January 2012
- December 2011
- August 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Archive for September 8, 2008
What is the “duty to defend”?
September 8, 2008 by Zale.
Under a liability policy of insurance, whether it be a policy for an automobile, business or anything else, the insurance company has two duties.
- The duty to indemnify the policyholder for the loss and
- The duty to defend the policyholder.
Most people just think about the duty to indemnify. This means that if the policyholder gets sued, and the plaintiff wins $500, then the policy pays $500.
Contrast this to the duty to defend. The duty to defend has to do with whether or not the insurance company is going to hire one of their attorneys to defend the policyholder at all. This phase is well before finding out whether or not the claim is worth the above $500.
The duty to defend the policyholder is broader than the duty to indemnify the policyholder. So, if the insurance company says that part of the lawsuit is excluded under a policy provision, this means that they still pay an attorney to defend you. If the insurance company does not defend or indemnify the policyholder, then they are just completely leaving the policyholder out in the cold.
So, if you find yourself in a position where the insurance company is denying you a defense, that’s a big deal. Have an attorney look at that denial for you. Being an attorney who has actually dealt with coverage denials, feel free to give my office a call.
Posted in Insurance Practices, Insurance Law | No Comments »