| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | Oct » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
- Adoption (2)
- Business Law (10)
- Child Advocacy (5)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Criminal Law (15)
- EDAD 6050/7050 (1)
- Freedom of Religion (6)
- Freedom of Speech (6)
- General Law (15)
- Gun Law (2)
- Immigration (1)
- Injury Law (34)
- Insurance Law (28)
- Insurance Practices (19)
- Juvenile (2)
- Litigation (22)
- Negotiations (5)
- Right To Life (6)
- You've got to be kidding! (3)
- January 11, 2012: If the State cheats, they should lose.
- January 11, 2012: The hiring and firing of "ministers" - Hosanna-Tabor v/ EEOC
- December 1, 2011: Tennessee Gun Laws
- August 24, 2011: Dealing with insurance companies.
- February 9, 2011: Tennessee sticks close to the insurance policy wording.
- January 16, 2011: Church Planting
- December 29, 2010: Child Custody and a "Material Change"
- October 31, 2010: Thankful
- May 2, 2010: Issues with sex?
- April 23, 2010: Is the National Day of Prayer Constitutional?
Blogs
Other Web Sites
- January 2012
- December 2011
- August 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Be honest in your proof of loss.
I noticed this recent TN bad faith case. In short, this is one of those cases where the insured’s property burns down and the insurance company insuring the property calls the fire arson, which is not covered.
Let’s set the stage. If you have a claim like this, one of the first people out there, other than the property adjuster, is the C & O or Cause and Origin expert. They are there to try to figure out why this piece building, all of a sudden, decided to increase it’s output of carbon and, consequently, lower its roof line to the ground. The adjuster is going to have the insured fill out proof of loss statements and that sort of thing. If the insurance company suspects that the policy holder or insured intentionally set the fire, then the insured can expect to have to sit for an Examination Under Oath, which is often followed by a denial of coverage.
Well, in this case, the jury found that they believed that the insured had made some misrepresentations as to what they had. This happens all the time, but the stuff that was misrepresented was no where to be found in the debris. So, the court said “no coverge for you!”
What do we learn from this? Just be honest. At the end of the day, its only money. Is your integrity really worth trying to inflate a claim?