You are currently browsing the Dowlen Law Blog weblog archives for November, 2008.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
- Adoption (2)
- Business Law (10)
- Child Advocacy (5)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Criminal Law (15)
- EDAD 6050/7050 (1)
- Freedom of Religion (6)
- Freedom of Speech (6)
- General Law (15)
- Gun Law (2)
- Immigration (1)
- Injury Law (34)
- Insurance Law (28)
- Insurance Practices (19)
- Juvenile (2)
- Litigation (22)
- Negotiations (5)
- Right To Life (6)
- You've got to be kidding! (3)
- January 11, 2012: If the State cheats, they should lose.
- January 11, 2012: The hiring and firing of "ministers" - Hosanna-Tabor v/ EEOC
- December 1, 2011: Tennessee Gun Laws
- August 24, 2011: Dealing with insurance companies.
- February 9, 2011: Tennessee sticks close to the insurance policy wording.
- January 16, 2011: Church Planting
- December 29, 2010: Child Custody and a "Material Change"
- October 31, 2010: Thankful
- May 2, 2010: Issues with sex?
- April 23, 2010: Is the National Day of Prayer Constitutional?
Blogs
Other Web Sites
- January 2012
- December 2011
- August 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Archive for November 2008
The practice of taking every case.
November 16, 2008 by Zale.
It has been suggested to me that I should take just about any injury case that comes up, even if I don’t see merit in the case. I disagree with this approach. I only take cases that I believe have merit. To do otherwise would support frivolous litigation. It also does a disservice to the client. If they have a bad case, the attorney should be the first to tell them.
Posted in Litigation, Injury Law, Insurance Law | No Comments »
Church Spats
November 10, 2008 by Zale.
I Corinthians 6:1-6 (NIV) states:
If any of you has a dispute with another, dare he take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the saints? Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church! I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? But instead, one brother goes to law against another—and this in front of unbelievers! (Scripture thanks to Biblegateway)
Unfortunately, churches seem to forget about this scripture when money or property is involved. The latest case of this is Avondale Church of Christ v. Merrill Lynch. In this case the Court of Appeals found that this case deals with ecclesiastical (church) law and the trial court had no jurisdiction.
So, what do we learn from this?
- If you are a church that claims to be an independent congregation, have some sort of written operating agreement.
- Read the scripture. There are plenty of us who are Christian attorneys who can mediate or arbitrate your church disputes. Don’t take the matter to court.
Here’s another scripture:
Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will. Romans 12:2 (NIV)
Posted in Litigation, General Law | No Comments »
What makes for a good slip and fall case?
November 9, 2008 by Zale.
Most attorneys in Tennessee do not take slip and fall cases without taking a long hard look at them. For me, I won’t just take one to add to my file count. I want to make sure that the hazard is NOT open and obvious. I prefer having proof that the property owner was aware of the hazard. I also prefer for my client to be completely free of any fault in fall.
Normally, the above is not the case. Most of the cases I was involved with as an adjuster, the injured person who fell was simply not watching what they were doing.
So, if you have a slip and fall, I will be happy to talk with you about it, but don’t get offended if I don’t take it.
Posted in Injury Law | No Comments »