Categories
- Adoption (2)
- Business Law (10)
- Child Advocacy (4)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Criminal Law (14)
- Diminished Value (2)
- EDAD 6050/7050 (1)
- Freedom of Religion (3)
- Freedom of Speech (4)
- General Law (17)
- Gun Law (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Injury Law (36)
- Insurance Law (31)
- Insurance Practices (22)
- Juvenile (1)
- Litigation (23)
- Negotiations (6)
- Right To Life (6)
- You've got to be kidding! (3)
Latest Postings
- May 2, 2010: Issues with sex?
- April 23, 2010: Is the National Day of Prayer Constitutional?
- April 14, 2010: Bullying in our schools.
- March 23, 2010: What to do in a crisis pregnancy situation?
- March 11, 2010: Adoptions
- February 13, 2010: Your appearance matters.
- February 5, 2010: What is a total loss?
- December 17, 2009: Insurance Coverage Issue?
- November 11, 2009: Why do you need a lawyer?
- October 13, 2009: What not to do on a field sobriety test.
Links
Blogs
Other Web Sites
Archives
The practice of taking every case.
It has been suggested to me that I should take just about any injury case that comes up, even if I don’t see merit in the case. I disagree with this approach. I only take cases that I believe have merit. To do otherwise would support frivolous litigation. It also does a disservice to the client. If they have a bad case, the attorney should be the first to tell them.