Categories
- Business Law (10)
- Child Advocacy (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Criminal Law (13)
- Diminished Value (2)
- EDAD 6050/7050 (1)
- Freedom of Religion (1)
- Freedom of Speech (2)
- General Law (17)
- Gun Law (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Injury Law (36)
- Insurance Law (31)
- Insurance Practices (22)
- Litigation (23)
- Negotiations (6)
- Right To Life (4)
- You've got to be kidding! (2)
Latest Postings
- February 13, 2010: Your appearance matters.
- February 5, 2010: What is a total loss?
- December 17, 2009: Insurance Coverage Issue?
- November 11, 2009: Why do you need a lawyer?
- October 13, 2009: What not to do on a field sobriety test.
- August 31, 2009: Looks like "Premises Liability" still exists in Tennessee.
- August 18, 2009: Yes, you can lose, even if you were rear-ended.
- August 6, 2009: See you at the pole!
- August 4, 2009: Premises liability and criminal activity.
- July 24, 2009: My Linux blog is back up.
Links
Blogs
Other Web Sites
Archives
Why doesn’t illegal mean “against the law” anymore?
“16 illegals sue Arizona rancher” Why is this even in court? I’m not sure who I hold more contempt for, the attorney(s) who agreed to take the case or the judge that didn’t summarily throw it out. If we don’t control our borders, then they will control us. These plaintiff should have been met by ICE when the walked in the court room.