You are currently browsing the Dowlen Law Blog weblog archives for August, 2011.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Feb | Dec » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
- Adoption (2)
- Business Law (10)
- Child Advocacy (5)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Criminal Law (15)
- EDAD 6050/7050 (1)
- Freedom of Religion (6)
- Freedom of Speech (6)
- General Law (15)
- Gun Law (2)
- Immigration (1)
- Injury Law (34)
- Insurance Law (28)
- Insurance Practices (19)
- Juvenile (2)
- Litigation (22)
- Negotiations (5)
- Right To Life (6)
- You've got to be kidding! (3)
- January 11, 2012: If the State cheats, they should lose.
- January 11, 2012: The hiring and firing of "ministers" - Hosanna-Tabor v/ EEOC
- December 1, 2011: Tennessee Gun Laws
- August 24, 2011: Dealing with insurance companies.
- February 9, 2011: Tennessee sticks close to the insurance policy wording.
- January 16, 2011: Church Planting
- December 29, 2010: Child Custody and a "Material Change"
- October 31, 2010: Thankful
- May 2, 2010: Issues with sex?
- April 23, 2010: Is the National Day of Prayer Constitutional?
Blogs
Other Web Sites
- January 2012
- December 2011
- August 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
Archive for August 2011
Dealing with insurance companies.
August 24, 2011 by Zale.
Watching the commercials, you would think that its easier to get along with an insurance company than your favorite pet. Occasionally folks have good experiences dealing with insurance companies. However, its often quite the opposite.
One of the biggest hassles folks typically have with insurers is dealing with automobile property damage. The company pays for one item and then denies another, even though the two items are practically side by side. They spend hours trying to save on parts, or haggling over them, when it actually takes more payroll dollars to do that, than expense dollars to pay for the item. It’s just crazy.
As an adjuster, and now as an attorney, I have seen instance after instance where, folks who did not, at first, seek legal counsel for their injuries, later sought it due to the way the property damage was handled. That makes no business sense, but that’s the culture of the modern insurance company.
It seems to me that a better marketing strategy would be having folks not hate your company after the process is done. Unfortunately, that’s simply not the way they do business these days.
Posted in Injury Law, Insurance Practices, Insurance Law, Business Law | No Comments »